컴퓨터/노트북/인터넷
IT 컴퓨터 기기를 좋아하는 사람들의 모임방
조회 수 2451 추천 수 0 댓글 0
왜 사람들이 하스웰에서 스카이레이크로 안넘어가는지 알것같습니다
아, 더 안습인건 나온지 좀 됐는데도 시피유값보다 보드가 너무 금값이네요 ㅜㅜ
CPU 스펙정보
| Haswell i5/i7 | Skylake-S i5/i7 | |
| Socket: | 1150 | 1151 |
| Manufacturing Process: | 22nm | 14nm |
| Cores: | 4 | 4 |
| Hyperthreading: | i7 only | i7 only |
| Smart Cache: | 6MB (i5) 8MB (i7) |
6MB (i5) 8MB (i7) |
| Bus Type: | DMI 2.0 (5GT/s) | DMI 3.0 (8GT/s) |
| Integrated Graphics: | HD Graphics 4600 | HD Graphics 530 |
| TDP: | 84 W (Standard i5/i7) 88 W (K-series i5/i7) |
? (Standard i5/i7) 95 W (K-series i5/i7) |
| Memory Type: | DDR3/DDR3L 1333/1600 | DDR4 2133 / DDR3L 1600 |
| Max Memory: | 32GB | 64GB |
테스트 셋업
| Core i7 4790K | Core i7-6700K | |
| Cores(Threads): | 4(8) | 4(8) |
| Base Frequency: | 4.0 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| Single Core Turbo Frequency: | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| All-Core Turbo Frequency: | 4.2 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| Smart Cache: | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Integrated Graphics: | HD Graphics 4600 | Graphics 530 |
| TDP: | 88 W | 95 W |
| Testing Hardware | Core i7 4790K | Core i7 6700K |
| Motherboard: | Asus Z97-A/USB 3.1 | Asus Z170-A |
| CPU: | Intel Core i7 4790K | Intel Core i7 6700K |
| RAM: | 2x Kingston DDR3-1600 8GB | 2x Kingston DDR4-2133 8GB |
| CPU Cooler: | Gelid Tranquillo Rev3 | |
| GPU: | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | |
| Hard Drive: | Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | |
| OS: | Windows 8.1 Pro 64-Bit | |
| PSU: | Seasonic X-850KM3 850W | |
| i7 6700K vs i7 4790K Performance Summary | |
| Unigine Heaven Pro 4.0 | No change with discrete GPU, >25% faster with onboard graphics. |
| PCMark 8 Pro | .5-1% increase in performance. |
| Geekbench 3 | 5% increase in multi-core performance. |
| Cinebench R15 | 1% increase in CPU performance, 1.5% decrease in GPU performance. |
| POV-Ray | 7.7% increase in performance. |
| Linpack | 12.5% increase in performance. *Updated using Linpack 11.3 |
| Lightroom CC 2015 | 1.5-2% increase in most image handling tasks, but a huge 15% increase in image export performance. ~2-3% increase in HDR/Panorama image creation performance. |
| Photoshop CC 2015 | 8.5% increase in overall performance. Varies anywhere from .8% to 16.7% depending on the effect. |
| Premiere Pro CC 2015 | 6% increase in H.264 encoding performance, marginal increase in MPEG2 encoding performance. |
